As UFC fans celebrated Dricus Du Plessis’ victory over Israel Adesanya at UFC 305, another event took over the MMA world. While du Plessis snatched his win, a dispute erupted in the decision of the heavyweight bout between Tai Tuivasa and Jaerzinho Rosenstruic, prompting referee Howie Booth to leave the panel
Booth’s Decision is Outrageous
After scoring impressive scores in the battle of Tuivasa and Rozenstruik, Howie Booth found himself at the center of a storm. Most of the audience, both resident and at home thought they knew the rightful winner. But Booth’s scorecard, 30-27 in favor of Australia’s Tuivasa left many incredulous.
Even though Rosenstruik won by decision, Booth’s scorecard created an uproar among UFC fans and insiders. The decision raised eyebrows and caught the attention of UFC president Dana White and other veterans of the sport.
Bisping Slaps Booth’s Judgment
UFC legend Michael Bisping didn’t stop to vent his frustration. Speaking on his YouTube channel, Bisping expressed his dissatisfaction with Booth’s score sheet, and questioned the competence of the jury.
“I’m telling you, something needs to be done about these judges—what the hell is going on?” Bisping exclaimed. He didn’t stop there, “…this judge, man, get the hell out of here!” The former two-division champion criticized the decision, insisting that fighters’ careers and income are on the line with every decision and it’s important to get it right
Bisping acknowledged the efforts of Tuivasa and Rosenstruik but couldn’t hide his disappointment at the controversial scores. The incident only sparked an ongoing debate about the fairness of judging in the sport, with Bisping calling for higher standards to protect fighters’ career integrity.
UFC Official Saying
Following the controversy, UFC boss David Shaw addressed the issue in a post-fight press conference. Shaw didn’t mince words, explaining the decision to fire Booth for the rest of the episode.
“Maybe the game wasn’t worth the night,” Shaw said. “I think everyone should be held to a higher standard. It doesn’t matter if I’m not doing my job or if you’re not doing yours. It’s good to sit on the bench for a while and reassess the business and make sure you get back on track next time.”
Shaw’s comments reflect the UFC’s commitment to maintaining high standards in the debut arena by emphasizing the importance of accountability. Booth’s decision to sit on the bench highlights the importance of fairness and fairness in judging big-stakes fights, especially in big-stakes fights like Tuivasa vs. Tuivasa. Rosenstruik in the emphasis
Tuivas Struggles Continue
The controversial decision by Tai Tuivasa adds another layer of disappointment to his recent run. The Australian fighter has now suffered defeats in his last four games, increasing the pressure on him to win. Rosenstruik, meanwhile, continues his ascent in the heavyweight division and is currently undefeated in his last two fights.
Other judges, Charlie Keach and David Lethaby, scored the fight favorably for Rosenstruik. Keech gave the first round to Tuivasa but made a second three to Rosenstruik, making it 29-28. Lethaby scored all three goals in favor of Rosenstruik, 10-9, to seal the win.
The Dispute Referee Worries the UFC
The incident at UFC 305 highlights the dynamics of refereeing in MMA, where irregular scores can have significant consequences for fighters As the sport evolves, the demand for referees who qualified, routine will be more important.
For now, the firing of Howie Booth is a reminder that the UFC is willing to act when standards are not met. The hope is that this will bring more accountability and fairness to future events, and ensure that fighters get fair recognition.
